Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Immigrants from Oceania
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Immigrants from Oceania
9.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
9.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
71.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,654,872 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,831,685 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 10.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.73% |
| Maximum | 48.3% | 30.3% |
| Range | 46.9% | 29.6% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 10.9% |
| Median | 11.9% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.8% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 6.0% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Malaysian (9.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Alsatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.54%), Osage (9.7%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Micronesia (9.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and Nonimmigrants (9.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Aleuts | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
| Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
| Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |