Carpatho Rusyn vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Chippewa
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Chippewa
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
2.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Carpatho Rusyn vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,393,502 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,626,002 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 21.7%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Carpatho Rusyn | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 5.7% | 9.5% |
| Maximum | 25.6% | 77.8% |
| Range | 19.9% | 68.3% |
| Mean | 15.5% | 26.4% |
| Median | 14.7% | 23.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.3% | 30.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 13.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 14.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Immigrants from Germany (13.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Barbadian (13.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Belizean (13.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Senegal (13.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Czechoslovakian (13.4%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
| British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Barbadians | 2.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 1.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 1.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Belgians | 1.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Czechs | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Spanish | 1.0 /100 | #249 | Tragic 13.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |