Sierra Leonean vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Sierra Leonean
Chippewa
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Sierra Leoneans
Chippewa
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sierra Leonean vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,419,123 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,626,002 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 29.6%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sierra Leonean | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 3.2% | 9.5% |
| Maximum | 52.9% | 77.8% |
| Range | 49.7% | 68.3% |
| Mean | 14.5% | 26.4% |
| Median | 12.5% | 23.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.8% | 30.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 13.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 14.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Sierra Leoneans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Immigrants from Panama (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Yugoslavian (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Hungary (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (12.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Malaysian (12.6%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
| Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
| Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |
| Yugoslavians | 73.9 /100 | #148 | Good 12.6% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 73.0 /100 | #149 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 72.1 /100 | #150 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.6% |
| Australians | 71.4 /100 | #152 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 70.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 68.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 68.7 /100 | #155 | Good 12.7% |
| Vietnamese | 67.9 /100 | #156 | Good 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |