Bulgarian vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Chippewa
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Bulgarians
Chippewa
11.7%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 188,709,586 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.478 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,626,002 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 40.3%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bulgarian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 9.5% |
| Maximum | 68.8% | 77.8% |
| Range | 66.5% | 68.3% |
| Mean | 17.0% | 26.4% |
| Median | 13.1% | 23.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.3% | 30.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.1% | 13.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.2% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.1% | 14.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (11.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Samoan (11.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Cypriot (11.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Paraguayan (11.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and Burmese (11.7%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Nepalese | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Samoans | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Burmese | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Peruvians | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |