Polish vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Polish
Chippewa
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Poles
Chippewa
13.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
19.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,988,373 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,626,002 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 25.5%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 9.5% |
| Maximum | 37.4% | 77.8% |
| Range | 35.4% | 68.3% |
| Mean | 13.9% | 26.4% |
| Median | 12.5% | 23.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.2% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 30.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 13.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 14.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Poles by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Northern European (13.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Estonian (13.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Basque (13.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Sudanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Lithuanians | 22.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 21.8 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.0% |
| Slovenes | 21.6 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 21.4 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.0% |
| Basques | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 20.4 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.0% |
| Estonians | 20.3 /100 | #204 | Fair 13.0% |
| Poles | 19.3 /100 | #205 | Poor 13.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 18.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 13.0% |
| Sudanese | 17.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 17.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 13.1% |
| Mexican American Indians | 17.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 16.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 13.1% |
| Swedes | 16.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 13.1% |
| Senegalese | 16.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |