Immigrants from South America vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South America
Chippewa
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South America
Chippewa
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South America vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 419,228,892 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.115 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,626,002 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 35.5%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South America | Chippewa |
Minimum | 3.2% | 9.5% |
Maximum | 24.4% | 77.8% |
Range | 21.3% | 68.3% |
Mean | 11.6% | 26.4% |
Median | 11.9% | 23.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 30.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 13.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 14.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 14.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South America by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Armenian (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Chile (12.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Turkish (12.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Chileans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Uruguayans | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |