Luxembourger vs Chippewa Family Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Chippewa
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Chippewa
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Chippewa Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,473,448 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,735,331 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 55.6%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Chippewa |
Minimum | 0.32% | 4.7% |
Maximum | 13.1% | 70.6% |
Range | 12.7% | 65.9% |
Mean | 5.5% | 19.0% |
Median | 4.9% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 26.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 16.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 12.7% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and Lithuanian (7.2%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guyanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Guyana (11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Central American (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Spanish American (11.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Blackfeet (11.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 11.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 11.2% |
Chippewa | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 11.2% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 11.2% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 11.3% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 11.3% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 11.3% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 11.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 11.3% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 11.3% |