Luxembourger vs Cherokee Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Cherokee
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Cherokee
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Cherokee Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,792,583 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379 and weighted average of 3.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,541,023 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 48.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 0.35% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 15.5% | 54.5% |
| Range | 15.1% | 51.1% |
| Mean | 3.7% | 10.6% |
| Median | 2.8% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 8.2% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 0.61%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 0.76%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Venezuelan (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from South America (5.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 4.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 4.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 3.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 3.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 3.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Ghanaians | 3.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |