Luxembourger vs Cherokee Vision Disability
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Cherokee
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Luxembourgers
Cherokee
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Cherokee Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,652,316 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.111 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,069,891 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 50.2%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 0.43% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 5.3% | 18.9% |
| Range | 4.8% | 18.1% |
| Mean | 1.7% | 4.8% |
| Median | 1.6% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.0% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.84% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.90% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.89% | 2.5% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Mongolian (1.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Egypt (1.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Nepal (1.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Turkey (1.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and Egyptian (1.9%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Hopi (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American (2.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Native/Alaskan (3.0%, a difference of 2.0%), Tlingit-Haida (2.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and Paiute (2.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |