Somali vs Cherokee Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Somali
Cherokee
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Somalis
Cherokee
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Somali vs Cherokee Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,100,573 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Somalis and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.790 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,541,023 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.46%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Somali | Cherokee |
Minimum | 1.1% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 31.7% | 54.5% |
Range | 30.7% | 51.1% |
Mean | 7.0% | 10.6% |
Median | 5.2% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 12.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Somalis and Cherokee by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Somalis are Chickasaw (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Venezuelan (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from South America (5.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Moroccans | 4.9 /100 | #230 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 4.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Laos | 4.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 3.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 3.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 3.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 5.7% |
Ghanaians | 3.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |