Jamaican vs Ecuadorian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Jamaican
Ecuadorian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Jamaicans
Ecuadorians
19.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Ecuadorian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 362,780,888 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129 and weighted average of 19.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,275,748 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 4.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jamaican | Ecuadorian |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 58.8% | 46.8% |
| Range | 56.7% | 44.9% |
| Mean | 20.6% | 18.9% |
| Median | 19.9% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 23.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 10.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans and Ecuadorians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Chickasaw (19.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.76%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and Ottawa (19.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Shoshone (18.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Laos (18.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ghana (18.9%, a difference of 0.51%), French American Indian (19.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and Potawatomi (19.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |