Swiss vs Ecuadorian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Swiss
Ecuadorian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Swiss
Ecuadorians
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Ecuadorian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 452,044,614 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,275,748 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 27.4%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swiss | Ecuadorian |
Minimum | 4.8% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 52.5% | 46.8% |
Range | 47.7% | 44.9% |
Mean | 16.6% | 18.9% |
Median | 14.3% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 13.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.5% | 23.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 10.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 8.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Swiss by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Soviet Union (14.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (18.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Shoshone (18.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Laos (18.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Cuba (18.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and American (18.8%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.2% |