Jamaican vs Ecuadorian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jamaican
Ecuadorian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Jamaicans
Ecuadorians
15.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Ecuadorian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,594,174 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,585,196 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.054 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 1.7%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jamaican | Ecuadorian |
Minimum | 5.3% | 0.14% |
Maximum | 29.8% | 28.7% |
Range | 24.5% | 28.5% |
Mean | 15.4% | 14.8% |
Median | 15.0% | 14.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 17.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans and Ecuadorians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |