Jamaican vs Costa Rican Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Jamaican
Costa Rican
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Jamaicans
Costa Ricans
19.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
64.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Costa Rican Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 362,780,888 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129 and weighted average of 19.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,202,107 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.463 and weighted average of 16.2%, a difference of 21.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jamaican | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 2.1% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 58.8% | 80.0% |
Range | 56.7% | 78.0% |
Mean | 20.6% | 19.6% |
Median | 19.9% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 20.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 17.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 16.8% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Chickasaw (19.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Spanish American (19.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Venezuela (16.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Yugoslavian (16.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Afghan (16.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 64.0 /100 | #171 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 62.3 /100 | #172 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | South America | 55.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Ethiopians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 45.4 /100 | #175 | Average 16.6% |
Hungarians | 45.1 /100 | #176 | Average 16.6% |