Syrian vs Ecuadorian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Syrian
Ecuadorian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Syrians
Ecuadorians
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
76.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Syrian vs Ecuadorian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 262,279,372 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.679 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,275,748 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 18.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Syrian | Ecuadorian |
Minimum | 3.7% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 80.0% | 46.8% |
Range | 76.2% | 44.9% |
Mean | 17.4% | 18.9% |
Median | 14.0% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 13.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 23.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 10.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 8.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Syrians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (15.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (18.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Shoshone (18.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Laos (18.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Cuba (18.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and American (18.8%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.2% |