Jamaican vs Filipino Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Jamaican
Filipino
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Jamaicans
Filipinos
19.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Filipino Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 362,780,888 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129 and weighted average of 19.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,600,431 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 72.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jamaican | Filipino |
Minimum | 2.1% | 0.99% |
Maximum | 58.8% | 31.6% |
Range | 56.7% | 30.7% |
Mean | 20.6% | 8.9% |
Median | 19.9% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 11.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 5.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Chickasaw (19.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Spanish American (19.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Tsimshian (11.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Taiwan (11.3%, a difference of 0.87%), Immigrants from India (11.0%, a difference of 3.5%), Thai (11.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 8.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |