Jamaican vs Tongan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Jamaican
Tongan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Jamaicans
Tongans
19.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Tongan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 362,780,888 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129 and weighted average of 19.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,473,172 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 45.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jamaican | Tongan |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 58.8% | 29.2% |
| Range | 56.7% | 26.5% |
| Mean | 20.6% | 12.8% |
| Median | 19.9% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Chickasaw (19.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Spanish American (19.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Demographics Similar to Tongans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.91%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |