Jamaican vs Brazilian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Jamaican
Brazilian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Jamaicans
Brazilians
19.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
89.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Brazilian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 362,780,888 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129 and weighted average of 19.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 318,856,218 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 27.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jamaican | Brazilian |
Minimum | 2.1% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 58.8% | 56.7% |
Range | 56.7% | 54.0% |
Mean | 20.6% | 16.6% |
Median | 19.9% | 14.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 20.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Chickasaw (19.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Spanish American (19.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Puget Sound Salish (15.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and Czechoslovakian (15.5%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |