Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Chinese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Chinese
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,710,626 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 39.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 37.5% | 25.9% |
| Range | 37.3% | 22.5% |
| Mean | 13.7% | 10.8% |
| Median | 12.3% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.2% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 5.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (10.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Taiwan (10.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from India (9.9%, a difference of 5.2%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |