Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Hmong Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Hmong
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Hmong
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
21.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Hmong Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,710,626 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,669,739 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.187 and weighted average of 13.9%, a difference of 4.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Hmong |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 37.5% | 33.3% |
| Range | 37.3% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 13.7% | 13.9% |
| Median | 12.3% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.2% | 17.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Hmong by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Immigrants from Kenya (13.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish (13.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Western Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Spaniard (13.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and Ugandan (14.0%, a difference of 0.89%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |