Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chippewa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Chippewa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Chippewa
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chippewa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,710,626 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 15.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 7.0% |
| Maximum | 37.5% | 78.4% |
| Range | 37.3% | 71.4% |
| Mean | 13.7% | 25.6% |
| Median | 12.3% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.2% | 31.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 15.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 15.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |