Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs African Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
African
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Africans
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs African Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,710,626 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,508,235 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 17.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | African |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 37.5% | 69.8% |
| Range | 37.3% | 69.4% |
| Mean | 13.7% | 22.8% |
| Median | 12.3% | 20.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.2% | 28.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 13.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 11.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Seminole (16.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Caribbean (16.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Grenada (16.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |