Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Ghanaian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Ghanaian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Ghanaians
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Ghanaian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,710,626 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,346,829 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 1.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Ghanaian |
Minimum | 0.21% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 37.5% | 29.2% |
Range | 37.3% | 27.7% |
Mean | 13.7% | 13.2% |
Median | 12.3% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.2% | 15.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Ghanaians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are German Russian (14.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Alaska Native (14.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Nigeria (14.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Nigerian (14.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (14.6%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |