Spaniard vs Chinese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Spaniard
Chinese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Spaniards
Chinese
13.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spaniard vs Chinese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 443,063,734 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Spaniards and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 13.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 33.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Spaniard | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 68.3% | 25.9% |
| Range | 65.9% | 22.5% |
| Mean | 20.4% | 10.8% |
| Median | 15.9% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.0% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.0% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.9% | 5.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Spaniards by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spaniards are Immigrants from Western Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Hmong (13.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Kenya (13.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Spanish (13.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and Ugandan (14.0%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Arabs | 28.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (10.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Taiwan (10.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from India (9.9%, a difference of 5.2%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |