Irish vs Chinese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Irish
Chinese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Irish
Chinese
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Irish vs Chinese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,836,064 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Irish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 19.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Irish | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 25.9% |
| Range | 97.7% | 22.5% |
| Mean | 23.1% | 10.8% |
| Median | 12.6% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.0% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.6% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.9% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.8% | 5.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Irish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Irish are Dutch (12.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Okinawan (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Finnish (12.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from England (12.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (10.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Taiwan (10.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from India (9.9%, a difference of 5.2%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |