Immigrants from Brazil vs Chinese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Brazil
Chinese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Brazil
Chinese
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
87.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Brazil vs Chinese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,799,416 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 23.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Brazil | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 25.9% | 25.9% |
| Range | 23.1% | 22.5% |
| Mean | 12.2% | 10.8% |
| Median | 11.8% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 5.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Vietnam (12.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Argentina (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (10.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Taiwan (10.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from India (9.9%, a difference of 5.2%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |