Immigrants from Bolivia vs Syrian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
Syrian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Syrians
4.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
96.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
78.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Syrian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,190,450 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.243 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,506,775 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.661 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 6.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Syrian |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.72% |
Maximum | 28.7% | 25.0% |
Range | 27.5% | 24.3% |
Mean | 5.2% | 6.3% |
Median | 4.2% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Pakistani (4.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (4.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Tongan (4.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and Laotian (4.7%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Romania | 97.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 97.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Aleuts | 97.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | France | 96.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 96.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Laotians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 96.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Pakistanis | 96.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 95.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Syrians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Spain (5.0%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |