Palestinian vs Syrian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
Syrian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
Syrians
4.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
91.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
78.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Syrian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,628,863 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,506,775 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.661 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 3.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Palestinian | Syrian |
Minimum | 0.73% | 0.72% |
Maximum | 15.1% | 25.0% |
Range | 14.3% | 24.3% |
Mean | 5.3% | 6.3% |
Median | 4.4% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Syrians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Pakistan (4.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (4.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (4.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Puget Sound Salish (4.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Egyptian (4.8%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Spain (5.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Hmong (5.0%, a difference of 0.89%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.0%, a difference of 0.94%), and Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Egyptians | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Palestinians | 91.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 90.7 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Soviet Union | 90.7 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.5 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.4 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 90.2 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Samoans | 90.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 89.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.9% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #136 | Excellent 4.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |