Immigrants from Latvia vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
 Yugoslavian
 Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Yugoslavians
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,716,282 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,591,967 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 4.4%.
 
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Yugoslavian | 
| Minimum | 1.6% | 2.0% | 
| Maximum | 20.7% | 30.2% | 
| Range | 19.1% | 28.2% | 
| Mean | 9.4% | 12.4% | 
| Median | 9.4% | 12.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 9.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 14.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 4.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 5.5% | 
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106  | Exceptional 12.6%  | 
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107  | Exceptional 12.6%  | 
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty | 
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141  | Excellent 13.0%  | 
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142  | Excellent 13.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143  | Excellent 13.0%  | 
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144  | Good 13.0%  | 
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145  | Good 13.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146  | Good 13.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147  | Good 13.0%  | 
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148  | Good 13.1%  | 
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149  | Good 13.1%  | 
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150  | Good 13.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151  | Good 13.1%  | 
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152  | Good 13.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153  | Good 13.2%  | 
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154  | Good 13.2%  | 
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155  | Good 13.2%  |