Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Yugoslavian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Yugoslavians
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
78.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,418,226 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,591,967 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 0.25%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Kazakhstan | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 0.34% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 29.8% | 30.2% |
| Range | 29.4% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 12.4% |
| Median | 12.5% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Yugoslavians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |