Immigrants from Nepal vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nepal
Yugoslavian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Nepal
Yugoslavians
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nepal vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,688,907 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,591,967 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Nepal | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 30.2% |
| Range | 31.0% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 13.1% | 12.4% |
| Median | 12.4% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nepal and Yugoslavians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |