Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Yugoslavian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Yugoslavians
12.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,673,263 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,591,967 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 7.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sri Lanka | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 21.1% | 30.2% |
| Range | 19.7% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 12.4% |
| Median | 10.3% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Estonian (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Serbia (12.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Philippines (12.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Scandinavian (12.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |