Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Kuwait Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
Immigrants from Kuwait
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Jordan
Immigrants from Kuwait
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
73.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Kuwait Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,199,618 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,830,592 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kuwait and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 1.9%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan | Immigrants from Kuwait |
Minimum | 0.79% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 38.9% | 16.9% |
Range | 38.1% | 13.9% |
Mean | 9.3% | 8.5% |
Median | 7.6% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 10.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Kuwait by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kuwait are Immigrants from Vietnam (8.7%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.70%), White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.91%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |