Fijian vs New Zealander Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Fijian
New Zealander
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Fijians
New Zealanders
18.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
87.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Fijian vs New Zealander Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,823,808 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,265,230 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 19.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Fijian | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 44.7% | 52.9% |
| Range | 40.5% | 48.7% |
| Mean | 21.1% | 17.6% |
| Median | 19.1% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.7% | 18.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 11.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 11.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Fijians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Nepalese (18.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Alsatian (18.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (18.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Jordan (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (15.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Armenian (15.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Israeli (15.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
| South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
| New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |