Immigrants from Argentina vs Egyptian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,133,430 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 273,353,549 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.789 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 0.72%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Argentina	Egyptian
Minimum	2.8%	3.6%
Maximum	56.7%	100.0%
Range	53.9%	96.4%
Mean	14.6%	18.3%
Median	12.6%	15.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.8%	10.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	16.1%	18.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.4%	7.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.3%	15.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.3%	15.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Argentina and Egyptians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Laotian (14.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Poland (14.6%, a difference of 0.16%), European (14.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Slovene (14.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Netherlands (14.6%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Turkey (14.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Argentinean (14.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Tlingit-Haida (14.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (14.6%, a difference of 0.18%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Philippines	98.6 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	98.6 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 14.5%
Immigrants \| Belgium	98.5 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 14.5%
Laotians	98.4 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 14.5%
Immigrants \| Argentina	98.3 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Poland	98.2 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 14.6%
Europeans	98.1 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 14.6%
Slovenes	98.1 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	98.1 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Austria	98.0 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 14.6%
Taiwanese	98.0 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	98.0 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Russia	97.9 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 14.7%
Tlingit-Haida	97.9 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 14.7%
Argentineans	97.9 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 14.7%
Immigrants \| Turkey	97.9 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 14.7%
Egyptians	97.9 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 14.7%
Ukrainians	97.7 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 14.7%
Macedonians	97.6 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 14.7%
Immigrants \| Italy	97.4 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 14.8%
Soviet Union	97.3 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 14.8%