West Indian vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
West Indian
Zimbabwean
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
West Indians
Zimbabweans
22.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
West Indian vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,099,029 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of West Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.266 and weighted average of 22.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 14.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | West Indian | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 7.2% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 52.4% | 59.7% |
| Range | 45.1% | 58.6% |
| Mean | 21.3% | 18.9% |
| Median | 20.4% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.1% | 23.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 12.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 11.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to West Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are Immigrants from Middle Africa (22.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (22.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Bermudan (22.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Cape Verdean (22.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and French (22.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 4.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Vietnamese | 4.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 22.0% |
| French Canadians | 2.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Malaysians | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 22.2% |
| French | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
| West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |