Ethiopian vs Yugoslavian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Yugoslavian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Ethiopians
Yugoslavians
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
66.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Yugoslavian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,923,037 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,303,830 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 3.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 24.9% | 24.8% |
| Range | 23.5% | 22.7% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 7.7% |
| Median | 8.2% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Yugoslavians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.26%), White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |