Immigrants from Malaysia vs Yugoslavian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Yugoslavian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Yugoslavians
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Yugoslavian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,782,180 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,303,830 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 0.81%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Yugoslavian |
Minimum | 1.1% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 26.4% | 24.8% |
Range | 25.3% | 22.7% |
Mean | 8.3% | 7.7% |
Median | 7.1% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia and Yugoslavians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Chilean (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Sri Lankan (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Armenian (8.5%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |