Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Belarus Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Immigrants from Belarus
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Ethiopians
Immigrants from Belarus
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
66.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Belarus Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,923,037 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,053,959 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 3.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Immigrants from Belarus |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 24.9% | 24.0% |
| Range | 23.5% | 22.9% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 8.1% |
| Median | 8.2% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Immigrants from Belarus by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.65%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |