Portuguese vs Yugoslavian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Portuguese
Yugoslavian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Portuguese
Yugoslavians
8.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
89.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese vs Yugoslavian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,364,700 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153 and weighted average of 8.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,303,830 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 1.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Portuguese | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 0.81% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 23.1% | 24.8% |
| Range | 22.3% | 22.7% |
| Mean | 8.7% | 7.7% |
| Median | 7.5% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese and Yugoslavians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Argentinean (8.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (8.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Puget Sound Salish (8.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Hungary (8.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (8.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |