Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Yugoslavian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Yugoslavian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Yugoslavians
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Yugoslavian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,315,048 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,303,830 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 0.070%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Yugoslavian |
Minimum | 2.6% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 14.1% | 24.8% |
Range | 11.5% | 22.7% |
Mean | 8.4% | 7.7% |
Median | 8.1% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Yugoslavians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |