Ethiopian vs Pennsylvania German Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Pennsylvania German
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Ethiopians
Pennsylvania Germans
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
66.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
66.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Pennsylvania German Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,923,037 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,657,746 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 0.050%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Pennsylvania German |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.74% |
| Maximum | 24.9% | 71.9% |
| Range | 23.5% | 71.1% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 12.1% |
| Median | 8.2% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 12.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Pennsylvania Germans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
| Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
| Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |