Ethiopian vs Tsimshian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Tsimshian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Ethiopians
Tsimshian
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
66.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
69.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Tsimshian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,923,037 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 0.46%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 3.9% |
| Maximum | 24.9% | 22.7% |
| Range | 23.5% | 18.9% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 9.9% |
| Median | 8.2% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Tsimshian by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |