Ethiopian vs Scotch-Irish Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Scotch-Irish
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Ethiopians
Scotch-Irish
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
66.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
82.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Scotch-Irish Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,923,037 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 545,166,810 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.785 and weighted average of 8.6%, a difference of 2.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 24.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 23.5% | 97.0% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 17.2% |
| Median | 8.2% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 19.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 10.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 15.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 15.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Scotch-Irish by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |