Immigrants from Spain vs Yugoslavian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Spain
Yugoslavian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Spain
Yugoslavians
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
79.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Spain vs Yugoslavian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,325,125 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Spain and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,303,830 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 1.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Spain | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 0.68% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 27.9% | 24.8% |
| Range | 27.3% | 22.7% |
| Mean | 7.9% | 7.7% |
| Median | 7.5% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Spain and Yugoslavians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Spain are Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |