Dutch West Indian vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Dutch West Indian
Ute
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Dutch West Indians
Ute
21.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch West Indian vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,504,644 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.403 and weighted average of 21.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%, a difference of 1.0%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Dutch West Indian | Ute |
Minimum | 9.2% | 9.6% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 57.4% | 90.4% |
Mean | 27.2% | 33.1% |
Median | 25.0% | 25.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.2% | 18.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.0% | 39.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 21.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 22.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 22.1% |
Demographics Similar to Dutch West Indians and Ute by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Immigrants from Somalia (21.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Bahamian (21.5%, a difference of 0.33%), Houma (21.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (21.4%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |