Cape Verdean vs Slavic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Slavic
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Slavs
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cape Verdean vs Slavic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,541,318 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,757,305 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 24.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cape Verdean | Slavic |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 0.21% |
| Maximum | 33.8% | 46.6% |
| Range | 31.8% | 46.4% |
| Mean | 15.1% | 12.0% |
| Median | 13.8% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 8.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |