Salvadoran vs Slavic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Salvadoran
Slavic
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Salvadorans
Slavs
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Salvadoran vs Slavic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,655,447 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,757,305 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 22.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Salvadoran | Slavic |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.21% |
| Maximum | 50.9% | 46.6% |
| Range | 49.7% | 46.4% |
| Mean | 15.9% | 12.0% |
| Median | 14.9% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 8.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |