Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Slavic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Slavic
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Slavs
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Slavic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,623,141 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.374 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,757,305 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 21.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Slavic |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.21% |
| Maximum | 26.2% | 46.6% |
| Range | 25.0% | 46.4% |
| Mean | 14.0% | 12.0% |
| Median | 14.4% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.2% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 8.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Armenia (15.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and French American Indian (15.1%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
| French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |