Immigrants from Caribbean vs Slavic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Caribbean
Slavic
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Caribbean
Slavs
16.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Caribbean vs Slavic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,490,616 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,757,305 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 34.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Caribbean | Slavic |
| Minimum | 5.4% | 0.21% |
| Maximum | 27.8% | 46.6% |
| Range | 22.4% | 46.4% |
| Mean | 16.9% | 12.0% |
| Median | 16.6% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.0% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.4% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 8.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Caribbean by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Caribbean are Seminole (16.9%, a difference of 0.12%), African (16.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Grenada (16.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |